News Corp Aggregated: Hillary Clinton's unflattering campaign's unflattering coverage | Monster.com, not Linked-In on Rupert Murdoch's mind?

-SDH It looks like all that speculation about News Corp being in talks with the folks at business social networking site Linked-In is just that, speculation at least for now. Well there is new speculation again, but this time it involves job search engine Monster.com. According to seekingalpha.com, Murdoch sent a letter to the Monster.com board offering them $4.8 billion for the company. Sounds familiar right? Yeah, he took similar route when he went after DowJones. But is this rumor, just a rumor or is this really happening? seekingalpha.com fails to spark any sense of "WOW! this may happen" They only mention that Sal Iannuzzi was hired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Monster.com back in April 2007 to reportedly set the company up to be sold, apparently because he's a wiz at selling companies or something. He sold a company called Symbol Tech Whooohooo! Like every other rumor, this is a wait and see. After all, News Corp is still chewing on their recent $5 Billion take over of Dow Jones. [seekingalpha.com] Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton should join the line of people who holds a grudge against Rupert Murdoch. Apparently Hill is kinda ticked off at the coverage The New York Post gave her during the New Hampshire debates. Is that what she was really worried about? [Newsbusters]

News Corp rolls out "The No deal" technique while they work it out with the LinkedIN guys

-YOSH OK so who is going out of their way to reiterate that News Corp is not in talks to buy social networking business site, LinkedIn.com? The source is shooting down everything from a rumored $1 Billion price tag to Rupert Murdoch regretting his Dow Jones purchase. OK so he didn't shoot that one down. But in previous reports, both companies already made it clear, or attempted to make it clear that they aren't in talks whatsoever. But come on why wouldn't a deal happen? It makes sense and we all know Rupert isn't afraid to throw cash at things he wants. Don't they know that the more they deny that talks are going on the more people will think that talks are really going on? Clearly this is an attempt to keep speculation in the media about a possible deal, perhaps a technique to get the LinkedIN side to agree to a buyout because they are probably holding out for more money than News Corp thinks they're worth. "Strategically, it would be a great fit," Goldman Sachs analyst Anthony Noto told Reuters last week. Whether it makes financial sense hinges on price, he said. There is no way LinkedIn is worth $1 Billion. News Corp, LinkedIn not in takeover talks: source [Reuters]

Aggregated media news

-MEDIA WIRE DAILY Do you own a start up web venture that's doing respectable business or getting respectable traffic or both? Do you want to cash out and become an instant millionaire? Then get your shit together, because Disney is going on a shopping spree for a bunch of websites like yours and they want to do it over the next 24 months [TechCrunch] The New York Times can't afford to keep on staff and they can't afford to hire any either [NYO] LinkedIn and Wall Street Journal? Now that's more like it [VB] Ad revenue is down at Ebony magazine. Three ad execs got canned and one of them was shocked when the axe fell in the middle of his forehead. [Folio]